Mueller, Ziemer, Hofer, Wirz, O’Donnell 11
Survey of Micro-Thrust Propulsion Options
Cube Sat - 5’th Annual Developers Workshop 2008
Application:
•
Application mostly for attitude control of
conventional to microsats (Dawgstar thruster).
•
Use as main engine is possible in a continuously
pulsed fashion, but may pose life issues for
electrodes.
•
Inherently pulsed operation may induced jitter on
flexible structures.
•
Contamination concerns related to Teflon propellant
largely refuted on EO-1 mission, but need to be re-
evaluated for each mission for extensive firings near
sensitive surfaces (optics).
> 1 kg S/C attitude control
Description:
Status:
•
Thrust generated through ablation of a solid Teflon fuel
bar in an arc discharge across its face.
•
Plasma generated in arc discharge is accelerated
between two electrodes by electrodynamic
forces
through interaction of self-generated magnetic field and
current.
•
Teflon fuel bar is spring-loaded and brought into
position for next firing.
•
Thruster is inherently pulsed, and modular -
carrying its
own fuel.
TRL 9. Flight proven on EO-1 and FalconSAT
III
•
The EO-1 thruster has flown on NM EO-1.
•
The Busek MPACS MicroPPT
has flown on Air Force
Academy’s FalconSAT
III (2007)
•
Smaller “Dawgstar”
version was under development
for a university nanosat.
Aerojet “Dawgstar”
PPT
Busek 3-axis
MicroPPT
(MPACS)
Supplier Designation Mass (kg) Fuel (kg) Isp (sec) Ibit (microNs) Impulse (Ns) Rep Rate (Hz) Power (W) Efficiency
Aerojet EO-1 4.95 0.7 650-1400 90-860 460 single - 1 70 (1 Hz) 8%
Aerojet Dawgstar 4.1 0.6 625 66 3000 3%
Busek MPACS 830 80 16%
Pulsed Plasma Thrusters (PPTs)
FalconSAT
III
Comments to this Manuals